Authorlytica vs Writing Analytics: two trackers, two philosophies.

What Writing Analytics is

Writing Analytics (writinganalytics.co) is a web-based writing tracker built around its own editor. You draft inside it, and it captures everything automatically: words written, words deleted, time spent, focus, typing time, and your most productive hours. On top of that it has streaks, over forty achievement badges, words-per-hour speed, version history, a fast-draft mode, and import and export for Word and Google Docs.

Its standout social feature is Writing Rooms: shared spaces where you write alongside other people in real time and can see each other making progress. The whole thing is paid: a 14-day trial, then $9 per month, or $7.50 per month billed annually. There is no free tier and no AI generation.

What Authorlytica is

Authorlytica is also a dedicated writing tracker, but it is log-based rather than editor-based. You write wherever you already write, in Scrivener, Docs, Word, a notebook, anywhere, then log the session in about ten seconds by entering a count or pasting the text to be counted. That means it never has to own your manuscript, and it works no matter what you draft in.

From that log it builds streaks, charts, rolling averages, and a projected finish date. It also does three things Writing Analytics does not: it tags each session with a mood, it scores you on a Writer Profile Radar across Speed, Mass, Consistency, Dedication, and Longevity, and it hands back automatic weekly, monthly, and annual Rewinds. Its social layer is an asynchronous feed: friends, leaderboards, hearts, and comments across the week, not only inside a live room. And it has a free forever plan.

Side-by-side

Where Writing Analytics is the right call

• You want auto-capture and in-editor depth. Writing Analytics removes the logging step entirely and adds words added versus deleted, typing time, focus, and time-of-day heat maps. That granularity only exists because it watches you type. But it only works if you are willing to draft inside it.
• You like live co-writing. Writing Rooms are real-time. If writing next to someone right now is what keeps you going, that is its core strength.
• You are happy to draft in a new editor. The trade for auto-tracking is writing inside Writing Analytics. If you do not mind moving your drafting there, you get the cleanest data of the two.

Where Authorlytica is the right call

• You will not move your writing. Most writers are loyal to their editor. Authorlytica tracks the habit without asking you to leave Scrivener, Docs, or Word.
• You want to try before paying. Writing Analytics is trial-then-paid. Authorlytica's free forever plan covers full tracking, so you can run it for months at no cost.
• You care how the writing felt, not just how much. Mood per session and the Writer Profile turn the log into something about you, not only your output.
• You want the year-in-review. The automatic Rewinds are the payoff that compounds. Writing Analytics does not produce them.

The honest take

These two are closer than almost any other pair in the space, and the choice is mostly about one question: do you want a tracker that owns your editor, or one that follows you around? Writing Analytics is excellent if you will write inside it and you want auto-capture with deep in-editor metrics. Authorlytica wins if you want to keep your current writing setup, start for free, and get mood, identity, and Rewinds on top of the numbers. Neither one generates prose. In a market full of AI writing tools, that is what both are selling: your numbers, not their output.

Read next: The best writing tracker in 2026: a complete guide.